When considering cities with a small skyline relative to its population, some notable examples come to mind. One such city is Istanbul, Turkey, which has a population of over 15 million people but lacks a dense urban skyline. This is largely due to the city’s historical and geographical factors, with many buildings restricted in height due to regulations protecting the historical skyline of the city.
Another example is Los Angeles, USA, which has a population of over 4 million people but is known for its sprawling layout and low-rise buildings. The city’s decentralized nature and focus on horizontal development rather than vertical construction contribute to its relatively modest skyline.
In addition, Mumbai, India, with a population of over 20 million people, also has a relatively small skyline compared to its population size. The city’s limited availability of land, high population density, and regulatory constraints have led to a lack of tall buildings in the city center.
Overall, these cities demonstrate that population size does not necessarily correlate with the density or height of a city’s skyline. Factors such as historical preservation, geographical limitations, urban planning strategies, and regulatory constraints can all play a role in determining the size and appearance of a city’s skyline relative to its population.